BUILDING OUR FUTURE
COMMITTEE REPORT
For the Annual
Congregational Meeting
February 8th,
2009
The Building our Future Committee was formed in March
2007. The objective of the committee is to make recommendations to the
congregation as to the direction redevelopment of
Members of the Committee
George Duncan
Blanche Fernandez Chandran
Ratnaswami
Bruce Hemming Gillian Roulston
Dave Henry John Roulston
Steve Lee
We have undertaken the
following activities during 2008
Based on a report
from our planning consultant, our discussion with architects and city planning
staff we have proposed development at
·
By maintaining
portion of current structure we can build more square footage of new facilities
but with a completely new structure on the site the local by-laws restrict the
building size to no more than 15,000 sq. ft.
·
Parking is a big
issue, by maintaining a portion of current structure, fewer parking spots would
be required and make the project feasible
·
The committee
felt that a community partner would be needed to help make the project a
success – a partner which would fit with Lansing’s vision for outreach and
provide funding to help with building the new space and sustain church
activities
·
After reviewing
different ideas (some of which were – seniors housing, a life-lease development
and space for non-profit organizations) the committee decided that a not for
profit day care centre would be a good fit at
·
We have been
working closely with a not for-profit day care operator with a proven track
record of successful centres at other churches – at
this point the operator is advising us on requirements of daycare centres based on guidelines from the provincial ministry –
we have no agreement in place with the operator
·
At the beginning
of 2008 we had narrowed our selection of architects down to two. Both developed
plans that kept the existing sanctuary structure in place and provided for day
care space
·
We selected J.D.
McAuley Architects to move forward with and have them
develop a site plan and floor plans for the new facility, which we could then
present to city planning for their review.
·
McAuley Architects only
work with church developments and we have been pleased with their work to date.
We have not entered into any long term contract with them as their work to date
has been billed on an hourly fee basis
·
Some of the
highlights of the proposed design for
o Increase in building footprint from 20,000 sq. ft. to
24,000 sq. ft.
o New multi-purpose sanctuary
o Existing sanctuary to be used as community hall
o Modern large kitchen on main floor for easy access to
food services
o Renovated space for Nearly New program including more
storage
o Renovated space for Food Bank program including more
storage
o Elevator for easy access to lower level
o Better access for the disabled and elderly
o Addition of all purpose rooms for meetings and
program space
o Additional office space for meeting and counselling
o Lower level for day care centre (approximately 8,700
sq. ft.)
o Proposed increase in parking area – 50 plus
spaces
·
In the spring of
2008 the Lansing Trustees were presented with a proposal from the developers of
·
The potential
proceeds from this sale along with the proceeds from
·
In July, Emerald
Park submitted their formal development application to the City of Toronto –
Lansing gave consent to have their site plan and floor plans submitted with the
Emerald park application – The transfer of Lansing’s density is an integral
part of the application based on Emerald Park’s desire for more density for
their development
Submission by
·
In July,
·
In September, we
received a response to our application – the response was brief which was good
and suggested that there are three areas at variance with city by-laws:
o parking
o setbacks
o landscaping
·
As the result of
the formal development application submitted by
o
how much density
will the city allow to be transferred to
o what should be the footprint of
·
These
discussions are ongoing and future meetings are to be scheduled in 2009
·
As the result of
the formal development application submitted by
·
One of the key
recommendations in the report was to have a public consultation meeting about
the development in December 2008
·
The local councillor had the meeting deferred and it is being
re-scheduled for early February 2009
·
To support this
public consultation process,
In
the summer, signage was erected on
·
In October,
·
The BOF
committee prepared a brochure, which outlines the benefits of new
·
A meeting has
been scheduled with the executive of the local ratepayer’s association, BOF
committee members and the
·
A letter writing
campaign has been undertaken in January 2009 where members from different
groups that use the church are writing to the local councillor
to show their support for the future development at
2009 is shaping up to be a
very interesting year at
Thanks to the committee
members for all their time and efforts to help move us further along on our
development journey.
Respectfully Submitted
Bruce Hemming